<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.claritycon.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Peterson&amp;#39;s Ponderings - All Comments</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/default.aspx</link><description>Technical findings, ideas, thoughts and news directly from me.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>re: SQL Server Reporting Services Subscriptions with custom security</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/05/28/sql-server-reporting-services-subscriptions-with-custom-security.aspx#62870</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:47:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:62870</guid><dc:creator>dpeterson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Marvin,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a published step by step article on MSDN showing an example implementation. &amp;nbsp;Use the link at the beginning of my post to the &amp;quot;MSDN security extension&amp;quot; to read the article. &amp;nbsp;The code example also comes with the SQL Server 2005 installation if you elect to install the extension examples during SQL Server setup. &amp;nbsp;The samples can be found in your SQL Server installation directory at c:\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Samples\Reporting Services\Extension Samples\FormsAuthentication Sample&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;(assuming you installed on the C drive).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Don&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=62870" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SQL Server Reporting Services Subscriptions with custom security</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/05/28/sql-server-reporting-services-subscriptions-with-custom-security.aspx#62616</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:36:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:62616</guid><dc:creator>marvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you please post an example?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I need it badly&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=62616" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Recent Links Tagged With "reportingservices" - JabberTags</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/05/28/sql-server-reporting-services-subscriptions-with-custom-security.aspx#35759</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:34:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:35759</guid><dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "reportingservices" - JabberTags</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Recent Links Tagged With &amp;quot;reportingservices&amp;quot; - JabberTags&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=35759" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Synchronization Framework - Worth a Look</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/06/29/microsoft-synchronization-framework-worth-a-look.aspx#34730</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:14:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:34730</guid><dc:creator>Ulssjsbl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks!, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=34730" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: An Option for Rounding</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2006/04/16/398.aspx#27189</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:36:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:27189</guid><dc:creator>Jerry Huang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess this is the floating rounding error, you may avoid this rounding error by&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;? Math.Round(0.285d, 2, MidpointRounding.AwayFromZero) &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;0.29D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;? Math.Round(0.285, 2, MidpointRounding.AwayFromZero) &amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;0.28&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;0.285d means convert 0.285(double) to 0.285(decimal)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=27189" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: October Microsoft DevCares LINQ Presentation Slides</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2007/10/11/3311.aspx#25024</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:14:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:25024</guid><dc:creator>deepthi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to learn Linq please provide me the presntion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=25024" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Threading model issues when using VB 6 COM components in a .NET Web Service</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/01/17/3621.aspx#22086</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:39:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:22086</guid><dc:creator>dpeterson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yazid,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't think you have this problem either way. &amp;nbsp;It doesn't matter what threading model the client has, this post refers to a problem that can occur if your web service (or WCF) code itself is internally using a VB 6 component to complete its service method functionality. &amp;nbsp;If your client code is VB the service it consumes doesn't care what threading model the client code is implementing and has no impact on how the actual service executes because the client call is coming in on a dedicated socket thread connection at that point which is all handled by your web service listener.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22086" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Threading model issues when using VB 6 COM components in a .NET Web Service</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/01/17/3621.aspx#15540</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:50:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:15540</guid><dc:creator>Yazid</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have VB code which calls a WCF (first) qnd then &amp;nbsp;WCF(first) calls another WCF (second)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I Since my VB component is STA I need to mqke the first WCF STA as well so that there is no blocking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is do I need to make the second WCF STA as well or just leave it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yaz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15540" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Log4Net versus Enterprise Library 2.0 Logging Application Block (Part I - File Logging)</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2006/01/30/184.aspx#13308</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:56:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:13308</guid><dc:creator>dpeterson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally I started using the MS Logging block in new projects and have moved away from log4net. &amp;nbsp;The perfromance is very comparable and along with the MS Logging block I can use the other enterprise libraries. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13308" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Log4Net versus Enterprise Library 2.0 Logging Application Block (Part I - File Logging)</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2006/01/30/184.aspx#13293</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:48:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:13293</guid><dc:creator>zeeshan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;now can any tell me how is the ultimate winner, log4net or MS Logging block.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=13293" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Threading model issues when using VB 6 COM components in a .NET Web Service</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/01/17/3621.aspx#5381</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:25:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:5381</guid><dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Any developers using Visual FoxPro COM DLL&amp;#39;s from a .Net web service will run into this same problem. &amp;nbsp;But thankfully, they can implement this same workaround.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5381" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Threading model issues when using VB 6 COM components in a .NET Web Service</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/01/17/3621.aspx#3947</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:00:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:3947</guid><dc:creator>Ken Codit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I encountered the same problem attempting to use VB6 COM components WCF. &amp;nbsp;The default threads created by WCF are multi-threaded apartments (MTA). &amp;nbsp;The legacy code I was attempting to expose was written in VB6 single threaded apartments (STA). &amp;nbsp;The following post by Scott Seely addressed the problem in a very nice way: &lt;a href="http://blogs.catalystss.com/blogs/scott_seely/archive/2007/09/27/203.aspx" target="_new" rel="nofollow"&gt;blogs.catalystss.com/.../203.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3947" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Threading model issues when using VB 6 COM components in a .NET Web Service</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2008/01/17/3621.aspx#3622</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:59:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:3622</guid><dc:creator>Kamran shahid</dc:creator><description>Nice article&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3622" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>account  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Performing Joins using LINQ to Objects</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2007/11/04/performing-joins-using-linq-to-objects.aspx#3468</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:32:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:3468</guid><dc:creator>account  » Blog Archive   » Performing Joins using LINQ to Objects</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://account.wpbloggers.com/account/?p=131"&gt;http://account.wpbloggers.com/account/?p=131&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>oyxa  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Performing Joins using LINQ to Objects</title><link>http://blogs.claritycon.com/blogs/don_peterson/archive/2007/11/04/performing-joins-using-linq-to-objects.aspx#3436</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:08:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">da947a97-509e-40e6-bbb5-1443ad47bf4e:3436</guid><dc:creator>oyxa  » Blog Archive   » Performing Joins using LINQ to Objects</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://oyxa.cn/?p=984"&gt;http://oyxa.cn/?p=984&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.claritycon.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3436" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>